Historical Knowledge as Perspectival and Rational: Remarks on the Annales School's Idea of History
Identifieur interne : 001348 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001347; suivant : 001349Historical Knowledge as Perspectival and Rational: Remarks on the Annales School's Idea of History
Auteurs : Cecilia Tohaneanu [République tchèque]Source :
- Metaphilosophy [ 0026-1068 ] ; 2000-01.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Interprétation, Invention.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
There is an obvious parallel between foundationalism, which ignores history in working out the conditions of knowledge, and radical relativism, which contends that by virtue of its own historical character there is no way to choose among different interpretations, all of which are “equally good.” Might it not be, rather, that the recent historicist attack on the very idea of rationality is as damaging as foundationalist objections against the plurality of conceptual schemes or frameworks? Can philosophy maintain the traditional distinction between the form and content of knowledge, between rationality and historicity _ between doxa and episteme?
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9973.00135
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000363
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000363
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001038
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001361
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000096
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000039
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000090
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001397
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001348
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Historical Knowledge as Perspectival and Rational: Remarks on the Annales School's Idea of History</title><author><name sortKey="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" sort="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" uniqKey="Tohaneanu C" first="Cecilia" last="Tohaneanu">Cecilia Tohaneanu</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:379275D74BA852C65FA55FA992E4CA0D95E0CD8B</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1467-9973.00135</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/379275D74BA852C65FA55FA992E4CA0D95E0CD8B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000363</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000363</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000363</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001038</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001038</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0026-1068:2000:Tohaneanu C:historical:knowledge:as</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001361</idno><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Francis:519-00-11828</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000096</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000039</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000090</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000090</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0026-1068:2000:Tohaneanu C:historical:knowledge:as</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001397</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001348</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001348</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Historical Knowledge as Perspectival and Rational: Remarks on the Annales School's Idea of History</title><author><name sortKey="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" sort="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" uniqKey="Tohaneanu C" first="Cecilia" last="Tohaneanu">Cecilia Tohaneanu</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">République tchèque</country><wicri:regionArea>Praha‐2</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Metaphilosophy</title><idno type="ISSN">0026-1068</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9973</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-01">2000-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1‐2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="169">169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="183">183</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0026-1068</idno></series><idno type="istex">379275D74BA852C65FA55FA992E4CA0D95E0CD8B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1467-9973.00135</idno><idno type="ArticleID">META135</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0026-1068</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Doxa</term><term>Episteme</term><term>Foundationalism</term><term>Historicity</term><term>History philosophy</term><term>Interpretation</term><term>Invention</term><term>Knowledge</term><term>Myth</term><term>Past</term><term>Perspective</term><term>Rationality</term><term>Relativism</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Connaissance</term><term>Doxa</term><term>Ecole des Annales</term><term>Epistémé</term><term>Fondationnalisme</term><term>Historicité</term><term>Interprétation</term><term>Invention</term><term>Mythe</term><term>Passé</term><term>Perspective</term><term>Philosophie de l'histoire</term><term>Rationalité</term><term>Relativisme</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Interprétation</term><term>Invention</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">There is an obvious parallel between foundationalism, which ignores history in working out the conditions of knowledge, and radical relativism, which contends that by virtue of its own historical character there is no way to choose among different interpretations, all of which are “equally good.” Might it not be, rather, that the recent historicist attack on the very idea of rationality is as damaging as foundationalist objections against the plurality of conceptual schemes or frameworks? Can philosophy maintain the traditional distinction between the form and content of knowledge, between rationality and historicity _ between doxa and episteme?</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>République tchèque</li></country></list><tree><country name="République tchèque"><noRegion><name sortKey="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" sort="Tohaneanu, Cecilia" uniqKey="Tohaneanu C" first="Cecilia" last="Tohaneanu">Cecilia Tohaneanu</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/EpistemeV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001348 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001348 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= EpistemeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:379275D74BA852C65FA55FA992E4CA0D95E0CD8B
|texte= Historical Knowledge as Perspectival and Rational: Remarks on the Annales School's Idea of History
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |